Reflection paper on a comparison of the narrative Ararat by A. Egoyan Essay

Reflection paper on a comparison of the narrative Ararat by A. Egoyan and documentary AGHET(catastrophe) - Essay Example Although they rarely take part in solving these problems, they provide an avenue of addressing these problems. Many films, targeting the social arena focus on issues such as drug abuse, crime, prostitution, child abuse among others. Further, they suggest solutions to these issues. Other films shed light on the certain important issues among us. While some are investigative, others base their ideas on research. Such are the kinds of films that either seeks to unearth certain phenomena affecting our current society. In various instances, we disregard film directors whenever they come up with a science fiction movie, creatively directed and produced to entertain us. Few are the times when we however disregard films when they address reality. This remains the biggest role played by the two films discussed in this essay, the narrative Ararat and AGHET Documentary. Based on the same idea, these two films mainly address the same topic, which is the Armenian Genocide. Approaches used by thes e films’ directors form the only difference in the films. While the Ararat is an acted narrative, the AGHET is a documentary of various accounts of witnesses during the genocide. They thus boost the human rights campaign, just as other films focusing on the social issues have done. Commonly referred to as the Armenian genocide, actions by Ottoman’s government of systematically exterminating a majority of the Armenian subjects from their historic homeland in the current State of Turkey define the genocide. The genocide took place in two phases. One of them was the mass murder of all bodied men in the region, as well as subjection to forced hard labour. The second phase was the deportation of women, children and the elderly where they were marched to the Syrian Desert, leading to numerous deaths. This was an inhumane way of dealing with these subjects. What was so important, leave along the political power and supremacy to warrant such actions to the people? For a long t ime, power hungry individuals have sacrificed innocent citizens for their individual selfish gains. Since the time of evolution, as revealed by Darwin, people and animals have had to override on others for success. This however did not warrant the Germans to treat people with the heightened levels of cruelty portrayed by the films during the genocide. Nothing justifies the actions of Ottoman Turk and his administrators to the Armenians during the genocide that claimed at least one and half people. Observers and experts describe the Armenian genocide as the first ever genocide to occur in the modern world. Owing to the organised manner in which the Ottoman’s administrators conducted the massacre to eliminate the Armenians, this is one of the most studied cases in the world so far from the holocaust. This forms the main reason why the filming of the events took place, 96 years later after their happening. They are still very significant to the world until this day. The effects of the genocide felt among the Armenians 98 years later after it took place shows the depth of the matter. The genocide started on the 24th April 1915 when Ottoman’s army arrested at least 250 Armenians and took them away from their homes. This day, commonly referred to as the Red Sunday was the night, which the interior minister Mehmed Talaat ordered the army to arrest and move to two holdings in Ankara, all notable Armenian leaders. However, the Tehcir War of 29th May 1915 led